Penalty under Section 129 shall not be imposed for sole reason that E-way has expired
Case Name: Neelmetal Products Ltd. SIDCUL Pantnagar vs Commissioner State Tax Appeal Number: 72/2020 Date of Judgement/Order: 16/08/2024...
top of page
Search
Aug 9, 2022
Devbhoomi Castings (P) Ltd vs Commissioner State Tax
Case Name: Devbhoomi Castings (P) Ltd vs Commissioner State Tax Appeal Number: 397/2021 Date of Judgement/Order: 09/06/2022 Related...
Sep 25, 2021
Penalty under Section 129 shall not be imposed for a clerical error in E Way Bill
Case Name: Neelmetal Products Ltd. SIDCUL Pantnagar vs Commissioner State Tax Appeal Number: 77/2019 Date of Judgement/Order: 31/12/2021...
Jul 21, 2021
Penalty not justified where E way bill was generated with wrong invoice date: Uttarakhand Appellate
Case Name: C & S Himoinsa (P) Ltd., Pantnagar vs. Commissioner State Tax Appeal Number: 85/2019 Date of Judgement/Order: 01/07/2021 ...
Jul 10, 2021
Penalty under Section 129 shall not be imposed for a technical error in E Way Bill : Uttarakhand App
Case Name: Shivalik Bimetal Controls Ltd., Solan Himachal Pradesh vs. Commissioner State Tax Appeal Number: 81/2020 Date of...
Jul 9, 2021
No penalty for mere clerical error in E way Bill: GST Appellate Authority
Case Name: Goodwear Fashions (P) Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner, Mobile Squad, Rudrapur (Uttarakhand GST Appellate Authority) Appeal...
Jul 1, 2021
Penalty not justified where E way bill was generated against Invoice Number instead of Bill of Entry
Case Name: Bacardi India (P) Ltd. 30 Rajpura Road, Dehradun vs. Commissioner State Tax Appeal Number: 24/2020 Date of Judgement/Order:...
bottom of page